Pre-eminent amongst hypervirulent strains are those belonging to ribotype 027. which were first reported in Canada in 2003 and shortly thereafter in the UK. Since its arrival in Europe, it has spread rapidly and has now been reported in 16 member states and Switzerland. The physiological factors responsible for the rapid emergence of

hypervirulent C. difficile strains remain unclear. It is known that they produce a binary toxin (CDT) in addition to toxins A and B, that they are resistant to fluoroquinolones due to mutations in gyrA, and that they are resistant to erythromycin. Representative strains have been suggested to produce more toxin A and B in the ‘laboratory flask’ (most likely due to a frameshift mutation in the repressor gene tcdC), to be more prolific in terms of spore formation, and also exhibit increased adherence to human intestinal epithelial cells due selleck to altered surface proteins. However, the contribution of these and other as yet unidentified factors to the

rapid spread of certain C. difficile variants (e.g., ribotypes 027 and 078) remains unclear at present. The advent of ClosTron technology means that it is now possible to construct genetically stable isogenic mutants of C. difficile and carry out reverse genetic studies to elucidate the role of specific gene loci in causing disease. The identification of virulence factors using this approach should help lead to the rational development of therapeutic countermeasures against CDAD. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.”
“Background. Current trends in population aging affect both recipients and providers Selleck SRT2104 of informal family caregiving, as the pool of family caregivers is shrinking while demand

is increasing. Epidemiological research has not yet examined the implications of these trends for burdens experienced by aging family caregivers.\n\nMethod. Cross-sectional community surveys in 20 countries asked 13 892 respondents aged 50+ years about the objective (time, financial) and subjective (distress, embarrassment) burdens they experience in providing care to first-degree relatives with 12 broadly defined serious physical and mental conditions. Differential burden was examined by country income category, kinship status and type of condition.\n\nResults. Among the 26.9-42.5% respondents in high-, upper-middle-, and see more low-/lower-middle-income countries reporting serious relative health conditions, 35.7-42.5% reported burden. Of those, 25.2-29.0% spent time and 13.5-19.4% money, while 24.4-30.6% felt distress and 6.4-21.7% embarrassment. Mean caregiving hours per week in those giving any time were 16.6-23.6 (169.9-205.8 h/week per 100 people aged 50+ years). Burden in low-/lower-middle-income countries was 2- to 3-fold higher than in higher-income countries, with any financial burden averaging 14.3% of median family income in high-, 17.7% in upper-middle-, and 39.8% in low-/lower-middle-income countries.